It’s Up to Us Now
First posted 01:42am (Mla time) Sept 04,
2005
By Sylvia L. Mayuga
INQ7.net
The nation is stumped this crucial weekend.
The tottering of a global civilization built on oil, with
prices soaring higher by the day, is exacting the steepest
price on dollar-short countries like ours. New taxes to
keep Gloria Arroyo’s administration afloat and the
oppressive national burden of servicing debt dating back
and ill spent since Marcos complete the hangman’s
noose dangling over our heads.
Will the results of secret negotiations all this weekend
become a new tipping point when they emerge at tomorrow’s
session of Congress’s committee on justice? At this
writing, only twenty-four hours remain for jockeying and
deal making – to add to or subtract from the 79 votes
necessary to elevate the impeachment case to the Senate.
Suddenly members of Congress are the men
and women of the hour. And Mrs. Arroyo’s former National
Security Adviser, Parañaque Congressman Roilo Golez,
says he has been receiving reports that besides the phone
calls the President has been making to tilt the neutrality
of congressmen and women with all manner of blandishments,
there have been unknown and suspicious looking characters
hanging threateningly around leading oppositionists, while
others have been seen fetched at the airport for secret
meetings.
“Gang-rape” is Mr. Golez’s
term for last Tuesday’s majority-railroaded vote in
the justice committee on whether three impeachment complaints
could be considered together or separately. It is an accurate
description of a spectacle of utter disrespect for public
sentiment that has been demanding the truth about the Garci
Tapes and the validity of Mrs. Arroyo’s continued
claim to the presidency, and the urgency of an impeachment
trial.
“The civil thing,” says Mr.
Golez, would have been for the majority “to talk to
the oppositionists who walked out” in sheer frustration
at the lutong macao climax to the game of attrition played
by Mrs. Arroyo and her allies over the past three weeks.
No such thing. The idea is to brazen it out.
The committee on justice’s deliberations
have been the last word in farce. Mrs. Arroyo’s stubborn
suppression of the truth against growing public sentiment
(80% of Metro Manila now in the latest SWS survey) can no
longer be disguised by legalisms. Juan de la Cruz watching
the justice committee’s telecast hearings can see
through it all.
So clear has the railroading strategy become
that after three weeks of quoting Fr. Joaquin Bernas, SJ,
1986 Constitutional Commissioner and legal expert on the
question, he is now being ignored by the GMA camp when he
himself punctured their argument this week -- that the three
impeachment complaints should be considered separately,
and only one can be considered under constitutional rules.
The GMA camp’s basis for this argument
is the precedent created by several impeachment complaints
against the Supreme Court’s Chief Justice Hilario
Davide – the much-quoted Francisco case. Now Fr. Bernas’s
historical quote in his Inquirer column on August 29 bears
repeating: “The situation in the current controversy
is different. On different days, the Lozano complaint, the
‘amended complaint’ and the Lopez complaint
were filed. The substance of all three complaints came under
the umbrella of ‘betrayal of public trust.’
“As I indicated last Monday, the
phrase betrayal of public trust was meant by the Constitutional
Commission to be a catchall phrase that could encompass
many elements. All three were referred to the Justice Committee
on the same day. Since they all involved betrayal of public
trust, they could be combined as one, to be tackled in the
same proceeding. Thus, only one proceeding was initiated
when the three were referred to the Committee.”
Philippine media is challenged now to its
greatest cunning as it hounds details of intensive deal
making between the Palace and Congress to stop the impeachment
dead in tracks before it even gets to striking distance
of the Senate.
It seems there’s more and more to
unearth with every day that passes on Mrs. Arroyo’s
survival mode. Says Congressman Golez, “In the past
few weeks, she’s been making all sorts of appointments
of justices, board secretaries, board members agency heads
and other officials for political accommodation. These have
been appointment-intensive weeks. I pity the bureaucracy
after this.” One such recent appointment is of the
wife of a certain congressman from Bicol to the monetary
board and its fat emoluments.
Golez preceded the Hyatt 10 when he took
a stand within the hour of listening to the Garci Tapes,
resigning his Cabinet position as National Security Adviser
as early as June. He was also the first to ask indignant
probing questions on who put the Intelligence Service of
the Armed Forces of the Philippines up to the wiretapping
in the first place.
Now he is one to believe former DSWD Secretary
Dinky Soliman’s revelation on the Palace’s hand
in party list representative Rodante Marcoleta’s quick
endorsement of the first weak impeachment case filed by
lawyer Oliver Lozano. This ploy now turns out to have been
first base in an overall game plan. Second base was nailed
down in last Tuesday’s disqualification of both the
better-prepared second case and the weak third case by legalistic
debate on “form and substance.” Third base is
dismissal of the Lozano complaint, the goal of the GMA team’s
alleged new round of vote buying.
Meanwhile it emerges that Marcoleta, who
endorsed the Lozano complaint, had actually been expelled
from his membership in the party-list Alagad, which filed
a case at the Comelec to revoke his nomination as their
representative. Not only did the risk of losing his congressional
seat make this party-list congressman as vulnerable to the
blandishments of Arroyo handlers as your friendly neighborhood
trapo. He may not even have been qualified to endorse the
complaint!
“It’s a short-term survival
game,” Golez observes about Mrs. Arroyo. “She’s
suppressing public feeling and that’s sitting on top
of a volcano. Eighty percent disapproval rating is well
above boiling point, with 700,000 people who want to end
her term by any means possible – that’s dangerous.”
And so a new rash of candle lighting rituals
has begun, the way it did with NAMFREL and JoeCon in the
80s, this time by a new Bukluran ng Katotohanan (Coalition
for Truth). This weekend, the Middle Forces have been gearing
up, in two fora at the Ateneo and La Salle, for another
stand against the odds created by another overstaying president
to rival Ferdinand Marcos.
The ball is back in our lap, people. How
much do we value the truth and a possible new beginning?
It’s up to us now.